Repeat
John Martin from Cork, 02 Jan 2012
This film was too much like the first The hangover. It was literary made from the same script, or at least 90% of in any way. The only two changes were the man that that went missing and the location. The one drugged them all,the same man got disfigured (losing a tooth in H 1 and getting a tattoo in H 2), the missing one was found back at the hotel where they were were staying in both , they used a monkey in H 2 to play the same part as the baby in H 1 and much more of the likes. It is in my option only made knowing it would be a success on the back of the first one. As a stand alone film it would be great but as a squeal it's just a repeat.
Only watch it if you haven't seen The Hangover.
Absolute Rubbish!
Elaine from Cork, 20 May 2012
This film doesn't even deserve 1 point. The original film was at least entertaining in spots, but this film has no redeeming qualities. It was obviously made to try and cash in on the original film's success. It isn't remotely funny and has no plot whatsoever. Any time spent watching this film is purely time wasted.
Not too bad
John from Wicklow, 13 Mar 2012
Sequels are usually a hit and a miss and never that original, somewhat playing off the first film and this is fairly true with the hangover 2. In saying that its still a very funny movie and you will find yourself laughing....alot. Good for a lazy night in with the missus and a large bottle of wine/beer and crisps.
Very good
Mark from Dublin, 24 Jan 2012
On its own its a very funny and well thought out film. Unfortunately the idea isnt original which takes from it a bit. It does have a deja vu feel in certain parts but still a good way to spend 90 mins
Some funny parts
Michael from Dublin, 12 Mar 2012
Some funny parts, story line is pretty much identical to the first one but apparently that was the directors idea. Worth a watch, dont think its as bad as some have said